The new evolution of consciousness is here
Hypocrisy at its Finest
Naturally, I have assumed the role of the asshole of the site (somebody has gotta do it). This behavior is necessary because of all the polarized people here with complete lack of balance. My behavior is not to be confused with the idea that I am spewing "negativity" because I am sad or in pain, or any other shit you stole from your introductory psychology teachers or books. I am doing it consciously, and for the good of the community, believe it or not. (many of you will not believe, or simply will not understand.) I am not hurting anyone for any reason.
It seems that what some people are saying is that they only want from this site what they could get out of any hallmark card. (That is what your pages, blogs, and chat is for if you want it, it is not doing anything for others in discussions in the forum.)
Why are we saying that we are open minded and accepting, when we reject half of our reality? Many people here are so polarized that they reject all anger, pain, sadness, and anything ignorantly labeled "negative." There is this idea that we are not allowed to talk about anything without saying love, light, and peace. What I don't understand, and I hope that you, yes, you, will see is why we believe in things, then completely reject them. Why do you even believe that sadness, anger, pain, etc. exist, if you will reject it from your reality and aren't allowed to say it or think it? Why deny half of the emotions, feelings, and thoughts that we experience?
People are saying that if we disagree with one another, we should restrain from "negativity" (that abstract, subjective nonsense word again), and deal with each other in a "polite and constructive way." Well, any way we deal with each other is constructive. And many prefer that we speak to them straight when we disagree rather than be condescending and sarcastic, (the "politeness is only a disguise for what's going on).
Why are some people suggesting that some things shouldn't exist? Why do you believe in things but reject them? That is not acceptance of your reality, though you claim some things that suggest otherwise about yourselves. In your polarized acceptance and half-love of all things, you are saying that you do not believe in conflict or resolution, growth, or life itself. It is sad that by refusing this world, you are denying your own lives of existence and experience. Some things are gray, and some are black and white. If things are black and white, I accept both. I don't label one as good, positive, light and one as bad, negative, dark. I am an accepting person. I do not preach love, then live in denial of half of my world.
What's the deal people? If you aren't ready for an open mind, then keep it closed, but don't deny others of the experience of life, the full spectrum of life.
It seems that what some people are saying is that they only want from this site what they could get out of any hallmark card. (That is what your pages, blogs, and chat is for if you want it, it is not doing anything for others in discussions in the forum.)
Why are we saying that we are open minded and accepting, when we reject half of our reality? Many people here are so polarized that they reject all anger, pain, sadness, and anything ignorantly labeled "negative." There is this idea that we are not allowed to talk about anything without saying love, light, and peace. What I don't understand, and I hope that you, yes, you, will see is why we believe in things, then completely reject them. Why do you even believe that sadness, anger, pain, etc. exist, if you will reject it from your reality and aren't allowed to say it or think it? Why deny half of the emotions, feelings, and thoughts that we experience?
People are saying that if we disagree with one another, we should restrain from "negativity" (that abstract, subjective nonsense word again), and deal with each other in a "polite and constructive way." Well, any way we deal with each other is constructive. And many prefer that we speak to them straight when we disagree rather than be condescending and sarcastic, (the "politeness is only a disguise for what's going on).
Why are some people suggesting that some things shouldn't exist? Why do you believe in things but reject them? That is not acceptance of your reality, though you claim some things that suggest otherwise about yourselves. In your polarized acceptance and half-love of all things, you are saying that you do not believe in conflict or resolution, growth, or life itself. It is sad that by refusing this world, you are denying your own lives of existence and experience. Some things are gray, and some are black and white. If things are black and white, I accept both. I don't label one as good, positive, light and one as bad, negative, dark. I am an accepting person. I do not preach love, then live in denial of half of my world.
What's the deal people? If you aren't ready for an open mind, then keep it closed, but don't deny others of the experience of life, the full spectrum of life.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Johnny-Angel on
-
i like your style aswell, love how you casually ignore my request and questions ;)
good luck to you bro.
-
-
well I sure have my conclussion, and that's good enough for me.
-
Permalink Reply by angela on -
Roddy, which one do you think we should listen to more,
the heart or the mind?
this obviously wasnt adressed to me but there is this political type program up north (ireland) called "hearts and minds"
it has really catchy music which is the only part i listen to but i think the heart and the mind can be enemies or friends,
whats the heart without the mind? useless! whats the mind without the heart? useless too!
as with everything, balance is necessary, but it is a pendulum, it has to keep switching, lori was talking about elasticity... at some point (maybe roddys) they can be friends. but even friends can turn into enemies so this balance thing does not end, like a pendulum (i think) ive never had a pendulum.
-
Permalink Reply by angela on
-
oh i think it does end, but its not with death, its with the new life that comes after death... which death? i dont know yet
-
Permalink Reply by Roddy G. on -
Yes I just read an ancient quote ( as you know I love them) that said that compassion is worthless without wisdom and wisdom is worthless without compassion. The heart and mind intertwined, ever moving fluidly. Where the yin and yang meet, one disperses into the other.
-
Permalink Reply by Amber on -
Whoaly shiznat!! Over 200 replies?! What exactly are we even discussing anymore? lol!!!
-
Permalink Reply by Kris on -
amber, were you seriously trying to make fun of my physical body? cool, but this isn't high school. Or is it? NLBHS? I make fun of or insult people based on what they say or their beliefs, not the body they were born with. And I'm not that insecure. It doesn't bother me because as it turns out, I have a very extraordinarily average sized penis, and I like it just the way it is. Besides, you know you want some of this. ;-)
-
Permalink Reply by Kris on
-
To be upset when someone insults you is normal for humans. . .but ask yourself why. The ego is responsible for the need to be accepted or be seen a certain way. We want to control what the other person thinks and says to suit our idea of truth. It is your own inability to master ego that is the problem in that situation. I think that is what Lane is trying to say. We have a choice to confront them or not but being upset serves no purpose. Making everyone act according to your idea of good behavior is not what being elightened or a master of ego and emotion is about. Honesty can be brutal if you don't have your ego in check. Being misunderstood by others is not your problem. All you do and say speaks for itself. Ideally one should accept all views and opinions without attaching to them. Feel emotion and express views but to attach to them is the cause of suffering You can't control others. This is the lesson we all need to learn to create a peaceful and healthy existence. You can always opt out of a discussion with someone who doesn't resonate with you. We always have a choice. Oneness is about accepting all as a part of a whole. Be very careful about sending animosity towards another part of you. This causes illness/cancer. Everyone is another aspect of you. Just because you don't like the way someone else thinks it is no reason to remove them. Someone said something like only shit comes out of assholes. Your asshole is a part of you. You need it
-
Permalink Reply by Kris on
-
thank you luxdivon.
i don't really mean staying quiet all the time... i mean if we make an effort to share some truth and a person is obviously not receptive... to me, if we continue, well yes that is our free will choice but i think maybe it is a violation of their free will right to stay closed to the message. at least that is how it started to feel for me.
i think i have the same basic understanding about evangelism. i don't think it's right to force the message on someone if that person has shown he or she is not open or interested. and in a way whatever we are excited about and wanting to share is a little like witnessing... speaking our truth... and that is one reason i really love this place, we can speak our truth here and feel accepted for it. or at least our truth does not fall on someone who is still asleep on their feet. and despite things that have been said here at one point or another, i don't think anyone here is sleeping on their feet. i don't think people would even be interested in joining this place unless they were awake.
-
Permalink Reply by Kris on
-
Why are we saying that we are open minded and accepting, when we reject half of our reality?
What I don't understand is why we believe in things, then completely reject them.
Why do you even believe that sadness, anger, pain, etc. exist, if you will reject it from your reality and aren't allowed to say it or think it?
Why deny half of the emotions, feelings, and thoughts that we experience?
Why are some people suggesting that some things shouldn't exist? Why do you believe in things but reject them?
" If ever a wonderful Wiz there was
The Wizard of Oz is one because
Because because because because because!!!
Because of the wonderful things he does! "
It is programming, it is robotic thought, it is the detraction of human experience to create an inhuman reality. It is based on some prototype that is obviously easily adopted by those who are gifted in thought and emotion, but can't stand those distinguishable qualities about themselves that could set them apart from being one special person amongst many robots that society's creating. Quite ironic, that human emotion, the thing that has set us apart from being robots, is exactly what is cleverly used in the downfall of human intelligent thought, revolution, and evolution. Wasteland of Oz.
© 2009 Created by Kumail
